Get Email Updates

Take Action

Featured Voice

College scholar to leave Indiana if RFRA passes in House Morgan Mohr • Kokomo
LGBT vote lobbied in hallways, not ads December 20, 2015 Source: Journal Gazette

CLICK HERE to read the original article on Journal Gazette.

Associated Press

INDIANAPOLIS – Several organizations preparing for the legislative debate over adding sexual orientation and gender identity to Indiana’s civil rights laws have aimed their lobbying efforts at the Statehouse hallways rather than TV airwaves.

Both sides say they expect dealing one-on-one with lawmakers will be more important than spending money.

Several Indiana business groups and corporations are supporting rights for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community, while religious conservative lobbying groups have come out against broader protections.

Michael Huber, president of the Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce, said it is supporting the LGBT protections effort by talking about how such a step could help the state’s economy by helping companies attract and retain talented employees.

“What we are not talking about is some kind of multi­million-dollar mass media marketing campaign,” Huber said. “It’s been one of relationship-building. We’re having the most success in private conversations with influencers at the Statehouse where we just talk about the future.”

The legislature returns in January for the 2016 session, where it will consider a compromise bill proposed by state Senate Republicans to extend civil rights protections to LGBT people but allow exemptions for religious institutions, some small businesses and rest­room policies.

The bill also would prohibit stricter local ordinances, such as those in Indianapolis, South Bend, Carmel, Columbus and several other cities throughout the state.

The debate has spread since last spring’s uproar over the state’s religious objections law, with religious conservatives maintaining that broader LGBT protections could force Christian businesses owners to violate their religious beliefs.

Micah Clark, executive director of the American Family Association of Indiana, said his organization has done television, radio and newspaper ads in past campaigns but will focus on talking with individual legislators. But he didn’t rule out some advertising if he believed it would make a difference.

“It’s possible that if it gets down to swinging one or two votes, that will be something that we’re going to look at,” he said. “We don’t have a lot of resources to do that, anyway.”

The gay-rights group Free­dom Indiana, which led the 2014 legislative fight against a proposed state constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, is most likely to spend money on social media ads rather than buying television or radio time, spokeswoman Jennifer Wagner said.

Eli Lilly and Co., Cummins, Salesforce, PNC Bank and other major companies have joined groups backing broader LGBT protections.

“I’ve never heard in any meeting anyone discuss it in terms of, ‘How much is this going to cost?’ ” said Bill Oesterle, former CEO of Angie’s List in Indi­anapo­lis. “It’s kind of telling that the dollar amounts are absent from those discussions. When something is a movement, people don’t talk about it in those terms. There’s a substantial amount of energy that is accessible here.”